|
Evan
Cheltenham HS
Life Numerous scientists have viewed life in various ways. Different perspectives on how life began have had a great impact on these views. There are two general theories about how life began. The first is called biogenesis. This view is sometimes called creationism. Biogenesis states that life came from life. This supports the Adam and Eve story. The second, called abiogenesis, is somewhat more scientific, stating that life came from non- life; that through the course of millions of years, life came about from the elements that were in the primitive atmosphere. I believe firmly in abiogenesis. I think that it is more practical, based on all the scientific evidence, that life came about as a result of a long period of chemical evolution, as stated by Alexander Oparin's heterotroph hypothesis. Life can not be described in one specific way, after taking into account all the different forms of life on earth. The first life forms, probably prokaryotes (bacteria) had a completely different existence than humans today and other mammals, eukaryotes, which are far more complex than bacteria. In a technical sense, all forms of life may be viewed as at least slightly similar. All organisms are made of cells, need energy, carry out chemical reactions, reproduce, etc. However this is not what I think of when I hear the word "life." If someone asks me, "So, how is life?" I don't respond, "Life is good. I'm maintaining homeostasis quite nicely, acquiring the right amount of energy, and my skin cells are reproducing at a healthy rate." Rather, I might say, "I'm fine. I saw a good movie last night with some friends, I'm doing well in school, and I'm looking forward to playing tennis tomorrow." For humans and other animals (to a certain extent) life involves not just physical health, but social and mental health as well. Life is not just what goes on in the body, but also how one interacts with others. This does not apply to a paramecium. |